|
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||||
 |
This letter from Daltons dated 3rd December 1982 accompanied the invoice shown below. Note the wording of the letter in paragraph 1. "--but could not do so until the question of the Second Charge with the Bank was cleared up. This has now been done and the position is as follows:-" |
| This
Invoice from Daltons is clearly stamped, dated and marked
as paid. It is therefore a legal instrument. At the first
paragraph it clearly states "--- and arranging for
the Bank to lift the Second Charge." Confirming the
wording of the letter above.
The National Westminster Bank Plc. have lodged a claim against my estate for the sum of £86,000, for which they claim to hold a Second Charge.
The extracts from the Affidavit that follows clearly attempt to change the wording of this Invoice. Such an act is illegal under the Theft Act. See the Summary of the Theft Act from the Home page |
 |
 |
This
is the first page of the Second Affidavit placed on the
Royal Courts of Justice records by SIMON DAVID HART of the firm of solicitors DENTON, WILDE SAPTE - acting for the National Westminster Bank Plc.
It is clearly intended to deceive the Court, and is a criminal offence under the Theft Act. |
| This
is Page x from the second affidavit. Note the wording of
paragraphs 16 and 17, especially the last three lines of
para.17 "I note that the Daltons invoice confirms
that the ONLY charge released was the first charge in
favour of Abbey National Building society ---."
Compare with the wording of the invoice at item 1. "--arranging for the bank to lift the second charge." |
 |